The Kindergarten Teacher , הגננת , directed by Nadav Lapid, is about
whether or not we appreciate poetry and poets in our society. This is a subject
that could have been of interest to the film-going public, but this film does
not succeed in gripping us sufficiently so that we can empathize with this
issue.
The story is about a kindergarten
teacher, Nira, who becomes obsessed with a 5-year-old boy who writes poetry. Nira notices that Yoav, one of her pre-school
children, goes into a trance every now and then, paces back and forth, and
begins to recite poetry. She becomes
fascinated by this, begins to favor the child, tries to teach him special
things, and copies down his poetry. Nira
is married with two grown children and is attending a poetry workshop where she
presents Yoav's poems as her own. Her
obsession enters every aspect of her life -- for example, she answers a phone
call from Yoav so that he can tell her his newest poem, even as her husband is trying to make love to
her (even his full frontal male nudity does not seem to distract her from this phone
call)!
Poetry in the film is
portrayed as sensitive and artistic, versus the heroic and masculine virtues of
our society. We see this in two scenes -- when Nira's son's army officer
congratulates them on making their son into "a soldier, a human being, a
man" and at the Chanukah celebration when the children sing about Judah
the Maccabee as the heroic "redeemer of the nation." Yoav's father, a successful businessman and restauranteur, is obviously against his
little boy becoming a poet and he does not want to encourage it, since he feels
that poets are unappreciated in our society.
According to Uri
Klein, the film critic for Ha'aretz, this is the best Israeli film
of the past year! But I choose to differ.
I got tired of the
film when it began to enter into the realm of political statements. Nira takes Yoav to the beach and teaches him a
poem about Ashkenazim and Sephardim, trying to radicalize him and teach him
about societal issues. Not only does
this seem inappropriate for a little boy, but it seems to be derailing the
narrative construct.
Mostly, I felt that
the pacing was drawn out and the camerawork was always drawing attention to itself. The camera lingered too long on each face, on each
moment, on each scene, creating a self-indulgent, troubling, uneasy feeling,
and creating too much sexual innuendo. When
Nira showers the little boy because he got sandy in the sandbox, the camera watches
her every movement so closely, creating exaggerated sexual tension and making
us feel terribly uneasy.
According to the
filmmaker, Nadav Lapid, the film is semi-autobiographical, in that he was that
little boy who wrote poetry. I much
preferred his previous film, The Policeman (previously reviewed on this blog).
No comments:
Post a Comment